check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / tweet_pad.txt

diff --git a/notes/tweet_pad.txt b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
index afa8c1a..2014592 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/tweet_pad.txt
+++ b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,18 @@
 
 Eliezer Yudkowsky has not been consistently candid in his communications with his followers, hindering their ability to exercise their responsibilities. 1/
 
+
+
+
+
+--------
+
+> Anyone who's worked with me on public comms knows that among my first instructions is "We only use valid arguments here."  (Which makes hiring writers difficult; they have to know the difference.)  I've never called for lying to the public.  Label the shit you make up as made-up.
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1760133310024671583
+
 ----------
 
-So, I'm about ready to publish my loud public denunciation of Yudkowsky for intellectual dishonesty (as pt. 4 of my memoir sequence). Is anyone interested in offering advice or "hostile advice" (trying to talk me out of something you see as destructive)?
+So, I'm almost ready to publish my loud public denunciation of Yudkowsky for intellectual dishonesty (as pt. 4 of my memoir sequence). Is anyone interested in offering advice or "hostile advice" (trying to talk me out of something you see as destructive, _e.g._ infighting while the world is about to end)?
 
 I'm eager for advice because this is a high-stakes political move and needs to be a _flawless performance_. (When you strike at a king, _you must kill him_.) My ideal outcome is for Eliezer to actually learn something, but since that's probably not going to happen (by the Law of Continued Failure), I'll settle for dealing targeted reputational damage.