check in

diff --git a/content/drafts/scattered-personal-reflections-after-a-tech-conference-or-smile-more.md b/content/drafts/scattered-personal-reflections-after-a-tech-conference-or-smile-more.md
index 9614b76..ae06a57 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/scattered-personal-reflections-after-a-tech-conference-or-smile-more.md
+++ b/content/drafts/scattered-personal-reflections-after-a-tech-conference-or-smile-more.md
@@ -36,15 +36,29 @@ Which sticker am I supposed to put on if I am to show solidarity? The _he/him/hi
 
 At the same time, I can't wear the _she/her/hers_ sticker. And I think there's a sense in which _can't_ really is a better choice of words than _don't want to_. It's not that I don't enjoy being refered to as _she_ in a context where that makes sense, like when I'm [crossplaying at a fandom convention](/tag/cosplay/), or in the Secret Blanchardian Conspiracy Chatroom, or in the ironic last sentence of the preceding paragraph. It's that, in real life, when I'm not playing dress-up and I can't hide my face behind the fog of net, _people are going to notice_ that I'm male and habitually use the English language pronoun for males on such occasions that they need to refer to me in the third person. I _could_ attach a sticker to my badge instructing them otherwise, but only in the same sense that I could tell them that black is white and cats are dogs—that is, probably not with a straight face.
 
-But none of this really matters: if you don't want to wear a sticker, you can just not wear one, and get on with enjoying the conference and meeting all sorts of interesting people with exciting technical things to say!
+But none of this really matters: if you don't want to wear a sticker, you can just not wear one, with no discernible social consequences. (At least, not this year!)
+
+I did get asked for my pronouns once (the first day, by someone who I think was not yet aware of the stickers)—the only time I've been asked for 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+-------
+
+and get on with enjoying the conference and meeting all sorts of interesting people with exciting technical things to say!
 
 On the first day, between training sessions, I sat down at the table of someone who was eloquently denouncing the hideously overcomplicated code they encountered in the "Quux-f1deb75f" community—which made sense, they explained, because the people who wrote those libraries were Trump supporters and Nazis and libertarians.
 
 Oh, that's interesting, I said. Do you think there's a big correlation between political views and code quality? With a good linter to operationalize _quality_, this is potentially amenable to empirical study ...
 
+At some point, the conversation paused to introduce ourselves. I gave my name as "Mark" ... and then the person asked, "What are your pronouns?"
+
 [...]
 
-Obviously, I would have no objection if the presentation had _harshly criticized_ Eric Raymond for some specific bad thing that he said, or if the authors had chosen to quote some author they liked rather than an author they didn't like, or if they had decided that the "itch-scratching" metaphor was sufficiently widespread as to be part of the commons and not worth
+Obviously, I would have no objection if the presentation had _harshly criticized_ Eric Raymond for some specific bad thing that he said, or if the authors had chosen to quote some author they liked rather than an author they didn't like, or if they had decided that the "itch-scratching" metaphor was sufficiently widespread as to be part of the commons and not worth attributing to anyone. But to verbatim quote
 
 [...]
 
@@ -86,3 +100,13 @@ Jerrica independently idenfitied it as a microaggression
 https://www.nateliason.com/blog/social-disobedience
 
 singular they for named individuals with an Anglosphere name or a beard in their profile photo
+
+I interrupted a woman, trying to finish her sentence
+
+heritability of politics actually makes sense: the moral foundations are the "true" trait, but in a particular country, that could predictably mean being a democrat
+
+https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/09/05/landscapes/
+
+"Politics of Process Defense" http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8120
+
+https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-are-shifting-the-rest-of-their-identity-to-match-their-politics/

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index c007596..22a2164 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -743,3 +743,11 @@ Extracted from reply to Ozy on categories—
 A side note, but—this doesn't actually seem hard to explain. If the ought-to-be-five means MtFs, well, you _can't_ transition MtF and _stay_ in the NFL—HRT is going to kill your performance. Even if you think the effect size of hormones is overhyped, this is a _very_ competitive area, you can't say, "Oh, it only affected performance like ten percent, that's nothing—ten percent is _huge_." This doesn't rule out Jenner-class eggs in the NFL.
 
 And if it means FtMs, well, people get into football as teenagers: there are going to be structural reasons making that difficult even if gynephilic FtMs _are_ the sort of people who would like to play (difficulty of transitioning _that_ early _and_ being stealthy about it, and difficulty of being accepted as one of the guys if you're not stealthy—let alone NFL/NCAA policy about steroid use, if the matter has even come up, which is probably hasn't)
+
+The tone of the video news report here makes me nervous (_deception_ is a crime, but the fetish itself shouldn't disqualify him from being a _crossing guard_) https://www.abc15.com/news/crime/pd-gilbert-man-fakes-down-syndrome-hires-caregivers-to-bathe-him-and-change-diapers
+
+This is basically the _Quillette_ article that I wanted to write: https://quillette.com/2018/09/12/stereotypes-are-often-harmful-and-accurate/
+
+https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijop.12529
+
+https://lesbian-rights-nz.org/shame-receipts/