-
-
-OUTLINE OF POINTS TO HIT—
-
- * ✓ beautiful moral idea of equality
- * ✓ —makes people believe that group differences are superficial/fake/social
- * make sure to explicitly explain _why_ this is appealing
- * ✓ but this is crazy because:
- * ✓ is does not imply ought
- * people feel the need to accept the naturalistic fallacy _inference_,
- but deny the antecedent and perform _modus tollens_—I think it's more
- tenable to reject the conditional
- * ✓ social vs. biological isn't even the axis you care about
- * but, we also assume things are biological/fixed when that's convenient for
- "minority" things we want to protect (sexual orientation, gender identity)
- * requiring crazy beliefs in order to be a good person is a drain, a drag, and
- a tax on sanity
- * _be specific_ about what's gerrymandered and wrong about "sex diffs
- real/gender identity not"