-we can expect sex to be fully consensual, because there's a fallback position of no sex if one party doesn't consent:
\ No newline at end of file
+we can expect sex to be fully consensual, because there's a fallback position of no sex if one party doesn't consent:
+
+
+-----
+
+
+I. Ozy says that my argument implies that lesbians aren't women
+ Reply: I didn't want to _define_ gender on psychology; rather, sexual dimorphism is actually real and psychology is _one_ of the implicated dimensions
+
+II. Ozy says that "people who would be contribute to the atmosphere you made this a woman-only event for."
+ Reply: bright lines and specifiability: you can get "people who contribute to the atmosphere" by picking a guest list of people you know,
+ Side note: the effect size here is greater than d=1
+
+if it sounds like I'm advocating stereotypes, well, I agree with Ozy that the solution is more categories
+
+III. Ozy argues that "look like street harrassers" is the relevant criterion; I think this is overestimating the extent to which bad male behavior is an artifact of ideology
+"has nothing to do with psychology anyway"—it has to do with _perceptions_ of psychology; bystanders can't _know_ that feminine-androphilic trans man is one of them; you could imagine an alternative world in which human physiology looked the same but there was no history of male violence, but that's not our world
+I agree that everyone deserves a place to pee; let's talk about changing rooms
+
+IV. Money analogy. I really like this analogy! I agree that money is a social convention, but what would it mean for money to be fully consensual?