check in

diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md
index 515e163..80ed473 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir-sections.md
+++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md
@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ _ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between
 _ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
 _ look for a place to link http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/discursive-warfare-and-faction-formation/
 _ parenthetical defending literal fraud?
 _ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
 _ look for a place to link http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/discursive-warfare-and-faction-formation/
 _ parenthetical defending literal fraud?

------
-requires net—
+_ link https://thingofthings.substack.com/p/why-callout-posts-often-include-trivial

 _ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
 _ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible
 _ Stephen Jay Gould
 _ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
 _ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible
 _ Stephen Jay Gould

diff --git a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
index fb060b7..e8c2ba8 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
+++ b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
@@ -669,4 +669,9 @@
 02/14/2024,118643,4\r
 02/15/2024,118643,0\r
 02/16/2024,118811,168\r
 02/14/2024,118643,4\r
 02/15/2024,118643,0\r
 02/16/2024,118811,168\r

-02/17/2024,,\r
+02/17/2024,118811,0\r
+02/18/2024,118811,0\r
+02/19/2024,118811,0\r
+02/20/2024,118902,91\r
+02/21/2024,118965,63\r
+02/22/2024,,
\ No newline at end of file

diff --git a/notes/tweet_pad.txt b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
index afa8c1a..2014592 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/tweet_pad.txt
+++ b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,18 @@
 
 Eliezer Yudkowsky has not been consistently candid in his communications with his followers, hindering their ability to exercise their responsibilities. 1/
 
 
 Eliezer Yudkowsky has not been consistently candid in his communications with his followers, hindering their ability to exercise their responsibilities. 1/
 

+
+
+
+
+--------
+
+> Anyone who's worked with me on public comms knows that among my first instructions is "We only use valid arguments here."  (Which makes hiring writers difficult; they have to know the difference.)  I've never called for lying to the public.  Label the shit you make up as made-up.
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1760133310024671583
+

 ----------
 
 ----------
 

-So, I'm about ready to publish my loud public denunciation of Yudkowsky for intellectual dishonesty (as pt. 4 of my memoir sequence). Is anyone interested in offering advice or "hostile advice" (trying to talk me out of something you see as destructive)?
+So, I'm almost ready to publish my loud public denunciation of Yudkowsky for intellectual dishonesty (as pt. 4 of my memoir sequence). Is anyone interested in offering advice or "hostile advice" (trying to talk me out of something you see as destructive, _e.g._ infighting while the world is about to end)?

 
 I'm eager for advice because this is a high-stakes political move and needs to be a _flawless performance_. (When you strike at a king, _you must kill him_.) My ideal outcome is for Eliezer to actually learn something, but since that's probably not going to happen (by the Law of Continued Failure), I'll settle for dealing targeted reputational damage.
 
 
 I'm eager for advice because this is a high-stakes political move and needs to be a _flawless performance_. (When you strike at a king, _you must kill him_.) My ideal outcome is for Eliezer to actually learn something, but since that's probably not going to happen (by the Law of Continued Failure), I'll settle for dealing targeted reputational damage.