-* realistic worldbuilding is hard, people write aliens or foreigners just like themselves; it's easy to fall into this trap even if you ostensibly know better
-* Planecrash summary
-* Keltham's proposal
-* This entire idea of "The government can't discriminate by race or sex" is specific Earth-craziness that only makes sense in relation to other Earth-craziness; it's not something you would spontaneously invent if you actually grew up in an IQ 140 Society that taught everyone probability theory as normative reasoning: in this essay, I will first explain the principle, and then dissect Keltham's example of military service which is the _uniquely worst possible example_
-* Probabily theory has no protected classes
-* If you happen to have more fine-grained information, fine, but you don't always
-* Expense of taking additional measurements
-* Measurement error
-* "sex" and "wisdom" are both abstract categories that it would suck if the category mispredicted you; there's no principled difference
-* The specific military example
+But more fundamentally, even if you assume strength-testing is free, we haven't yet taken into account all _other_ sex differences that are relevant to military performance. It's not just that any other individual traits (_e.g._, aggression) that you select for will stack multiplicatively, resulting in even more extreme ratios. There are group-level effects that aren't captured by measuring the traits of individual soldiers: the social dynamics of a squad of fifteen men and one woman are going to be different from those of a squad of sixteen men. Even if you've selected a woman for strength and every martial virtue to equal any man, do the _men_ know that in their hindbrains, or are they going to be biased to want to protect her or seek her favor in a way that they wouldn't in an all-male environment? You could command them not to—but does that actually _work_?
+
+[TODO: and who is this helping, exactly? Is it worse for a woman to be drafted? Yes! (Quote what Thellim says her world believes about male nature.) Keltham acknowledges the possibility of rape, and then schemes about trying to solve it with truthspells—but why are you even trying to solve this problem at all?]
+
+[TODO: okay, we want to accomodate exceptions; that's important. (We also want to accomodate exceptions like people without college degrees: college _or_ have an awesome portfolio is fine.) If there are women who really want to fight to defend their homeland, then either induct them or set up a special women's company depending on the empirical social design trade-offs (lower cohesion _vs._ lost skills due to no cross-sex mentorship). But "draft men, but accept women volunteers" is a _Pareto improvement_ over "Draft everyone based on strength"; it's not ilani to _ignore Pareto improvements_ because of American taboos.]
+
+[TODO: misrepresentation of the Light: Dath ilan has a concept of "the Light"—the vector in policyspace perpendicular outwards from the Pareto curve, in which everyone's interests coincide.]