_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?)
_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
+
pt. 4 edit tier—
✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering
✓ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
✓ ending qualifications on "fraud" and whether it might be a good idea
✓ selective argumentation that's clearly labeled as such would be fine
-
-- if you only say good things about Republican candidates / Stalin's five year plan
-- he used to be worthy of trust
-_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
-
+✓ if you only say good things about Republican candidates
+✓ he used to be worthy of trust
---
+_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
+_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between
_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
_ https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars
_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible